Craigslist, the Go-To App For Hypergamy

stock-illustration-16763067-unorthodox-families

Many of the social myths about women and feminism are being exposed and destroyed by the internet, social media and cheap, ubiquitous digital cameras.  A record of behavior is being created that will establish for all time that women are at least as likely to cheat as men and probably more so given their greater ability.  Consider the college girlfriend home for the holidays without her boyfriend.  What does she do

hyper0

Craigslist is probably the most convincing proof for blue-pill people (and even some of the red-pill people) of female hypergamy and promiscuity.  Virtually all the contested issues show up on Craigslist, such as the young women now focused solely on education and career that they don’t have time for relationships and aren’t interested in a relationship anyway.  But when the biology catches up to them… like this one…

hyper1

Sometimes they aren’t focused on themselves, they’re single because they’re alpha widows.  Consider the following narrative of a woman who’s been pining away for 14 years for her personal Alpha.

hyper2

Many of them do winding up slutting their way through their twenties and with their biological clock ticking, they suddenly come to a decision.  Notice the sense of entitlement in this young woman’s post and the fact she won’t be lying to men anymore…

hyper3

Unfortunately, most of these girls (if they do marry) wind up settling for a guy they really aren’t attracted to.  What happens, after a period of time, is predictable.  Take this example of a husband that’s working his ass off to provide for his family.  How does his wife handle that?  She’s on Craigslist!

hyper4

Or this one, in which she makes it plain that while she wants to stay married, she wants the tingles and evidently that’s absent at home.

hyper5

Some are more discrete, such as the presumably married woman out of town on a business trip making plans to find someone younger, with *stamina* and discretion.

hyper6

Some wives take a different path toward trying to solve the problem of unhappiness with their husband. Take this wife, for example:

hyper7

Many will agree that women will willingly share a high-value man, but as I’ve stated before, some of them discover that they like the arrangement.  If one goes to any major-city Craigslist and looks in the “women seeking women” category of personal ads, there will be numerous ads by couples seeking a woman to join their relationship and swing both ways.  It’s become a specific category (mw4w) under the “Casual Encounters” section and while one might not think this is popular, the numbers tell a different story.

Keep in mind that Craigslist is populated (from what I can see) gamma and omega men for the most part.  The women tend to be either quite good-looking or completely cringe-worthy.  Keep in mind also, I’m only using data from the Casual Encounters segment of the personals and comparing the mw4w with the m4w sub-categories within Casual Encounters.   I point this out because there is another major category called Men for Women but that’s not where I pulled the data.

Typically (unless the ads are flagged and removed) they stay up for 60 days or until the 2500 max number of ads in that category has been reached.  In Houston, the men for women category maxes out and the ads drop off within about three days.  There’s also the issue of flagged ads being removed, which happens a lot more often in the m4w and w4m categories than it does in the mw4w category.    Indianapolis had 439/2500 ads, Phoenix had 1037/2500.  Evansville, IN had 103/1228, Boise, ID had 241/2500.  Des Moines had 185/2500, Houston had 1043/2500, Ashville, NC had 141/1932 and good old Ann Arbor, MI limped in at 100/1394.

Evansville, Ann Arbor and Ashville all demonstrate that couples looking for another woman represent about 7% to 8% of the number of men placing ads for women.  What does this tell us?  Other than it’s happening a lot more than most people would believe, not much.  It appears that it’s driven more by the women than the men, though, just from a casual read of some of the ads.  A very good friend who once identified as a lesbian and is now identifying as heterosexual (not bisexual) told me that her husband wanted her to recruit another woman to share their bed.  She asserts that many of the women are doing this because their husbands want them to.  Without serious research we won’t know.   I predict the next generation of dissertations covering this phenomenon will be interesting reading.  I will admit that while currently it seems to fall into the area of kink, it’s producing a school of thought like this, taken from a recent Craigslist ad by a couple looking for another woman:

hyper8

When you hear blue-pill people say “women aren’t like that” just direct them to the Craigslist personals… but not while at work.

Ashley Madison (ashleymadison.com) is also proof that a lot more wives cheat on their husbands than many would imagine.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Marriages Go Their Own Way. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Craigslist, the Go-To App For Hypergamy

  1. Pingback: I am Single Again (And I Should Have Been All Along) | The Reinvention of Man

  2. sn0rkmaiden says:

    So, if I wrote an article stating that all men like sleeping with prostitutes, based upon data garnered entirely from visiting a single brothel, that would a valid conclusion would it?

    • “women are at least as likely to cheat as men and probably more so given their greater ability

      That was stated, in part, as an assertion. This is a hotly contested issue as women raise the cry of NAWALT in hopes of maintaining the feminist mystique. However, as I pointed out, the ubiquitous presence of digital cameras and the widespread availability of cheap DNA tests are now disproving the notion that men are the ones far more likely to cheat than the women.

      Nowhere in this post did I say that “ALL” women will cheat. I said “women are at least as likely to cheat as men and probably more so given their greater ability.” By “greater ability” it should be observed that any women that’s reasonably HWP can get laid with an hour of deciding to do so. Simply walking up to random men and offering a quicky in a nearby motel room, van, public toilet or even in an alley behind a dumpster will get a positive response in short order.

      The fact that these women are posting on craigslist, and the number of married women who have accounts on ashleymadison should be viewed from the perspective that they represent only the women who can’t find a suitable partner in their local market- either for reasons of discretion or reasons of aesthetics. This is the tip of the iceberg.

      You’re free to write anything you want, but if you want to argue that men are far more likely to cheat than women you’re going to have quite the uphill battle because the evidence (which had only been self-reported previously) is now showing up as third-party data with a much higher level of reliability and that data shows us something quite different. Widespread availability of DNA paternity testing kits and the relatively low cost of those tests is demonstrating that a *significant* number of wives cheat, and because they’re hormonally driven to cheat during their window of highest fertility, their cuckolded husband is defrauded into raising some other mans child.

      • sn0rkmaiden says:

        Ah fair enough, by your final comment: ‘When you hear blue-pill people say “women aren’t like that” just direct them to the Craigslist personals’ I thought you were implying that this was the norm among women, rather than a refutation to the hypothetical argument that women never cheat on their partners. So is your article merely pointing out, via this small number of examples, that there are some women out there who are not faithful in their relationships? In which case I won’t argue with that, it’s a big world out there.

        I believe the current stats on non-paternity (by which I mean a father not being the biological father of his legal child) is quoted as 10%, though this figure has been disputed as being too high. Whatever the real figure, it will include instances of known non-paternity eg. adoption, step parent etc, which suggests that while it certainly happens, it does not happen in the vast majority of marriages. Obviously this is of no comfort to a man devastated by learning his wife has cheated on him, but it shouldn’t put people off getting married, any more than we should avoid crossing the road or getting into a aeroplane.

  3. monkeywerks says:

    sn0rkmaiden,

    The most recent data suggests its about 20% of men being actively cuckolded. This is from DNA testing labs. It does not include adoptions or anything like that. Women are less faithful than men. Study after study had proved this.

    I will object on the type of man who posts on CL. I put an add up once in awhile for lollzz and there is pretty good business as they say. Enough to keep me busy. More than 1/2 of the respondents are married or involved women. I wont even talk to a fat or ugly woman. But then again I just say call me so I can pull your hair and spank you in my ads. It makes for great loolllzz.

  4. caprizchka says:

    From my own experience, the search for the third-party via the internet has it’s own dysfunction. “Many will agree that women will willingly share a high-value man, but as I’ve stated before, some of them discover that they like the arrangement. If one goes to any major-city Craigslist and looks in the “women seeking women” category of personal ads, there will be numerous ads by couples seeking a woman to join their relationship and swing both ways. It’s become a specific category (mw4w) under the “Casual Encounters” section and while one might not think this is popular, the numbers tell a different story.” The opposite dynamic, that is, for a “bull”, has its own issues as well. In the latter case, generally speaking, the couple wants the man to leave after he’s enacted the fantasy (although not always). The search to add additional females to a harem of some sort also applies.

    The stories I hear about how this works out (or rather doesn’t) including my own tells me that sociological and psychological dysfunction is the norm rather than the exception. But that may well because of the hidden expectations of all parties are not fully expressed along with the general sociological dysfunction of today.

    Scenario 1: The female of the couple wants to try lesbian sex. He is eager to help her. They look for a “pet” who they can abandon soon afterward and who is entirely self-sufficient (career driven), or someone who she can dominate, or someone who will “cuck” the man, etc.

    The respondent is hoping for sexual excitement, a place to live, money, or all three, even if she presents herself as being purely in for the excitement. She therefore is a potential financial liability as well as a sexual threat to the original female’s position, and since the couple may or may not have a male-dominated dynamic (even if they say they do), catfighting ensues.

    Scenario 2: The female of the couple is pretending that she wants to try lesbian sex in order to get her mate interested in sex again, because their dynamic is suffering or she’s let herself go. With the remaining factors being the same as Scenario 2.

    Now the respondent has an additional vulnerability to exploit.

    Scenario 3: The couple is looking for a permanent third, and the couple is ostensibly and effectively male-dominated. Therefore, the female’s motivations are to please him first.

    In my view, Scenario 3 is the only possible situation that has any prayer of being uniformly positive for all parties concerned. Not to say that Scenario 1 and 2 can’t have a brief positive outcome only that it isn’t likely.

    Lots of couples like the above 3 complain on internet discussion boards, in real life discussion groups, etc. that they can’t find their “unicorn”. Chances are this failure has to do with a Scenario 1 or Scenario 2 situation.

    Just my opinion and observations.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s